No, Don't Resurrect the Cube for Schools
Dan Knight
- 2002.12.06
Yesterday Jeff Adkins explained How a
revised Cube could save Apple Education. Sorry, but I have to
disagree.
Yes, I agree 100% that Apple needs a much less costly computer so it
can compete on price with Dell and the other Wintel clones - but
the Cube is the wrong
way to do it.
I had a Cube. It was gorgeous. It was fast. And it had some serious
design flaws that would make it a very poor choice in schools.
I suspect Adkins has never set up a Cube. It's just the opposite of
the iMac. You have the computer, the keyboard, the mouse, a pair of
speakers, an external power supply, and a rat's nest of cables
converging on the bottom of the Cube. Too many pieces.
The power supply is not small, and I suspect it would sit on the
floor rather than the desktop. Oops, I spilled a Coke (or Evian or OJ)
into the power supply. Zap!
The speakers are like oversized Clackers (remember those) or Bolos.
Unplug them and you've got a pair of dangerous weapons. Not a good idea
in a school.
The Cube is relatively stable, but it is a bit top heavy. Imagine
one getting knocked off the desktop and crashing to the floor. Shards
of plastic everywhere? Probably - a lot of cracks at the very
least.
And to really have fun with a Cube owner, pass your hand over the
top of the computer. That's where Apple put the power switch, which
doesn't require any pressure at all. Shut down.
No, the Cube is absolutely the wrong computer to put in our schools
because is was designed for the executive suite, not the classroom.
A Macintosh designed for education - and I sincerely believe this is
something Apple must do to survive in the education market - should not
have external speakers or an external power supply. It should not be
easily tipped, nor should a wave of the hand turn it off.
The ideal education Mac would be a traditional desktop configuration
so it can sit beneath and support a 14" or 21" monitor. It needs a
single media bay, a single hard drive, one empty socket for a memory
upgrade, 10/100 ethernet, state of the art video, and built in
speakers. It should be difficult to open without a tool, and the power
switch should require some physical effort. The media drive should be
hard to break, which might give an edge to slot-loading drives.
There is no need for PCI slots. AirPort compatibility is a good
idea, but the lowest cost version should be wired networking only. The
hard drive need not be huge or fast - 20 GB if Apple can still buy
them. The CPU needn't be a speed demon. If the video supports Quartz
Extreme (16 MB VRAM is adequate for that), a 600 MHz G3 could make for
a very competent entry level education computer. 256 MB of memory would
be perfect - plenty for OS 9 and adequate for OS X.
Don't worry about a DVI connector. As Adkins suggested, a plain old
fashioned SVGA port will let schools pull old monitors out of the
surplus room and put them back to work. A couple USB ports and a single
FireWire port should be adequate. Functionally, it would not be
completely unlike a headless iMac or screenless iBook.
Education price? I'm guessing Apple could offer such a machine for
no more than $400 in quantity. Then offer improved models: 700 MHz with
32 MB VRAM for $100 more, a 700 MHz G4 and 512 MB RAM for another
$100.
Apple could probably base the motherboard on current iBook, iMac,
and eMac designs. The case - I see something like the old Quadra 630.
The question remains, Is Apple really serious about conquering the
education market, or are they content to only sell to school districts
that can afford more expensive computers?
Recent Content on Low End Mac
- World Book Encyclopedia 2012 DVD, Tommy Thomas, Reviews, 2013.03.05.
"You may be asking yourself, in an age of Wikipedia and instant information, is World Book still relevant?"
- Vintage Computer Festival SouthEast, April 20-21, 2013, Simon Royal, Mac Spectrum, 2013.02.25.
Old Apple gear and old PCs.
Latest Deals on Low End Mac
