MacBook Air v. Lenovo ThinkPad X300
From Timothy Sipples:
Dan,
When the MBA was announced I was arguing that it really didn't stack
up against Lenovo's ThinkPad
X61s from a hardware engineering standpoint, which is why I was so
disappointed. Now the comparison gets even worse: The specs for the
Lenovo ThinkPad X300 are now available. Here they are:
- 2.0 GHz Intel dual core
- 800 MHz front side bus, 667 MHz memory
- 2 memory slots, expandable to 4 GB of RAM
- 13.3 inch 1440 x 900 LED display
- 1.8 inch 64 GB SSD (larger hard disk presumably an option)
- full size illuminated keyboard
- both TrackPoint and touchpad
- 7 mm integrated SuperDrive
- 4 hour standard battery (with multiple in-flight swappable options,
including replacing the DVD drive with a second battery)
- integrated microphone and camera
- fingerprint reader
- Bluetooth
- 802.11n
- wide area WAN options (EV-DO, HSPDA, Wimax, etc.)
- GPS option
- audio in and out jacks
- VGA-style video connector
- computer lock slot
- 3 USB ports
- onboard Gigabit ethernet port
- docking connector (for dock with more USB ports)
- 318 x 231 x 23.4 mm (at thickest point, 18.6 mm at thinnest)
You can configure this machine with a weight range from 2.5 to 3.17
lb. For example, you can insert a bezel (included) in place of the DVD
burner, or you can leave it installed inside the machine.
This is one seriously superior machine to Apple's offering. The
Apple has only two advantages: it's 4 mm thinner (does anyone care?),
and it runs Mac OS X. In every other respect it will be vastly
outclassed by Lenovo's latest.
I think my MacBook is wonderful, but I'm looking for a new machine
that saves a couple pounds. Lenovo seems to have figured out the
formula. Why can't Apple?
Timothy Sipples
Timothy,
Apple and Lenovo had very different design goals.
Apple wanted to create a field computer to supplement your desktop Mac.
Lenovo wanted to create a road warrior machine where your notebook
could be your primary PC. The only drawback is that a 64 GB solid state
drive is going to drive up the price significantly and not be enough
storage for a lot of road warriors. Using the 160 GB hard drive found
in the iPod classic would solve both problems.
There's no denying that the X300 has it all over the
MacBook Air in terms of hardware- faster CPU, expandable RAM, lighter
weight, more ports - while the MBA is thinner, beautiful, and runs Mac
OS X. But hack OS X for the Lenovo, and you'd have a killer
machine.
Dan
Upgrading from a MacBook to a PowerBook?
From Musa Opiyo:
Hi Dan,
I have been reading Low End Mac for close to about three months now,
and I have come to appreciate the articles on the site with advice on
Macs.
I have a question. I have a MacBook which I bought
recently as my first Mac. Its one of the newer models with 2.2 GHz
Intel Core 2 Duo and 2 GB RAM. As much as I am enjoying it, one of
the really big drawbacks is the keyboard. I am a college student who
writes a lot, and I have rather large hands. Although many people have
touted the keyboard as revolutionary, typing for long periods on the
keyboard really puts a strain on my hands.
Like many out there, I waited for Steve Jobs' keynote this week in
the hopes that he would release a 12"
PowerBook replacement and was rather disappointed with the MacBook Air. I say this because
for a while I have been considering selling this MacBook and buying a
used 12" PowerBook. I'm all for portability, and I have no problem
finding Mac alternatives for the Windows programs that I used to
use.
My only dilemma (as stupid as this may sound) is that I'm stepping
down rather than up in terms of a product. I'm into my second year in
college and have two more years left. Would it be suitable to sell this
MacBook and go for the PowerBook? Also, should Apple release a new
operating system before the two years are up, then would the PowerBook
support it?
In terms of writing, the PowerBook keys are perfect for writing in
that the keys are larger and more suitable, in my opinion, for the
purpose. Yet at the same time I can't help feeling that the keyboard
alone is an insufficient reason to want to get ride of the MacBook.
I would appreciate your thoughts and advice on this.
Regards,
Musa
Musa,
If you're getting what you really need - a better
keyboard for all of your writing - then moving to a 12" PowerBook from
your 13" MacBook would be an upgrade. While it's not as fast and can't
run Windows, it's filling a very real need for you. Upgrade the
keyboard and portability; downgrade CPU speed. Sounds like a fair trade
to me.
Another option is to buy a good keyboard for writing
and stick with the MacBook's built-in keyboard for taking notes. There
are lots of good USB and wireless keyboards out there that work just
fine with the Mac. When I ran Low End Mac from my 400 MHz PowerBook G4, it was
primarily with an external wireless Logitech keyboard and mouse - which
I'm still using seven years later.
If it fits your working style, that would be a far
more economical choice than selling your MacBook and picking up a nice
used 12" PowerBook G4.
Dan
My iMac Is Crumbling Too
From Matthew Urban:
Good morning! I saw your article How the G3 iMac Crumbles
and have to write. (BTW - I wrote articles for Low End Mac in the
Matt's Mac column of long ago.)
I had an indigo 400
MHz Summer 2000 iMac that I bought refurbished from the Apple Store in March
2001. $750 or thereabouts. Over the years I upgrade RAM and a hard
drive, and experienced one lightening strike, which took out one
FireWire port. The iMac sat in front of an east-facing window which
always had indirect sunlight.
Last summer I replaced a battery in the iMac, as one day it wouldn't
start. Easy enough to do, popping this and that out, remove and replace
the battery, and back in business soon. The only odd thing was the
power cord seemed a little bit loose.
Well, two weeks later, in August, the iMac did not start again.
Hmmm. I again popped out the shell had it on its end and was surprised
to see fragments of hard rubber fall on the desk from the iMac.
Where was it coming from?
I believe it was the female plug or holder of the power plug, which
completely disintegrated! There was, all across the motherboard, bits
and pieces and dust from the plug.
No iMac! I had counted on that iMac to work another three or more
years.
At that point I asked my college student daughter to get an early
family Christmas gift, a MacBook during the college iPod promotion. We
now have a new white May 2007 MacBook, and my
other daughter got a new iPod as a gift. For value, the education
promotion in my mind is a very good deal if you have a son or daughter
in college.
I was able to recover data on the internal hard drive (and
AppleWorks and Toast Titanium 5.2.3) by buying an external hard drive
case from OWC. Apple Works 6.2 works very well on the MacBook,
translating current Word and Excel files sent to me. I also transferred
Graphic Converter from my old iMac hard drive.
Note - my Performa came in
handy for the week or so between iMac and the MacBook. The 635 Performa
worked well. I connected the DSL to my 2001 vintage Asante hub, and I
was in business again.
All in all, the iMac served faithfully from March 2001 through
August 2007. And I was able to reutilize the old hard drive and
software too.
Regards, Matthew
Matthew,
It's great to hear from you again! (Matt's Mac
appeared for over a year in 2001/02.) I'll bet you could find a
replacement power connector from a
dealer who specializes in Mac parts or from someone on the LEM Swap List who is parting out a dead
slot-loading iMac. I just hate to see a Mac taken out of service if a
simple fix might restore its usefulness.
Congratulations on the MacBook - and the incredibly
long life of your Performa! That was one of the most flexible models
Apple ever made, definitely ahead of its time with the TV tuner
card.
Dan
My Rev. B iMac Lives!
From Seann Giffin:
I just thought I'd show you both how happy my iMac is [see iMac Rev. B Nightmares] thanks to some
expert advice and a weekend on LimeWire. :)
Seann
Seann,
Congratulations. I wouldn't have had the patience you
exhibited in getting this iMac up and running.
Dan
Fencing in Type Using HTML
From Dov Ivry:
Hello Dan
You're still writing about Claris Home Page, so if you don't mind
I'm going to throw at you a question. First the background.
I used Macs exclusively from 1993 to 2003, the last one being a G3
which died. At that point my youngest, a boy, was 15-1/2, and he
insisted on a PC because "there are no games on Mac." So I went over to
the dark side.
I'm in Israel. I first put my site up in 2000 using Claris, which I
found on the Web. I even wanted to pay for it, not having yet been
corrupted by my exposure to the Web, and sent an email to an address
given in Germany. They never answered, so what can you do?
The new PC arrived, and I called a guy who had every program ever
made on his PC and asked him if he had Claris for Windows. Sure enough.
So I was able to keep on truckin'.
In the course of seven years I must have produced close to 100 pages
with Claris, and still I don't know any code that I am aware of. I got
a steady steam of viewers for my pages, but nothing huge. Then last
month I put up a page
critical of Reddit and got inundated.
What made me cringe was that I checked the page on my son's spanking
new PC, which does everything but fly, and he's got a wide screen. The
page was spreading out to fill that wide screen, which made it look
like hell warmed up. I put up a note to the viewers recommending they
use the old standard small screen and then went looking for an HTML
editor to correct this, in other words, freeze the width on all
monitors.
I understand it might be possible to fence in the type by putting
blocks on either side of it, and I may end up trying to do that.
Meanwhile I've gone through maybe 20 editors of every kind and
description, and I don't see any that freeze the width of the type.
Maybe I don't know what to look for. I checked this Kompozer as well. Didn't find it. (They
don't even let you fix your preferences for fonts as Claris does. You
can click one font, but not the list, if I am reading it right.)
To the question. Is there an editor that will freeze the type width
in all monitors? Is it possible in Claris?
I'm hoping to go back to do some serious writing soon, so for that
I'm again going to get some kind of Mac. The only venues I've been
comfortable in writing is an old-fashioned non-electric typewriter and
Nisus. Since I now prefer to depend
on computer memory rather go back to scavenging through piles and piles
of paper every time I want to check something, it has to be Nisus. When
that happens in the next few weeks, I'll be sending you another
question, where I can get Claris for Mac today?
Thanks for your time.
Dov Ivry
Dov,
You're not going to find a program that does what you
want, because it's the nature of HTML to spread out to fill the window.
There are JavaScript programs that can resize a window, but most people
consider it rude to have a page resize their browser window. Here at
Low End Mac, we make no attempt to control window size and deliberately
design the site to work in windows of almost any reasonable size.
If you want to assure that your writing doesn't run to
the edges of the browser window, you can either use a three column
table with fixed widths on the first and third columns or use Cascading
Style Sheets.
Dan
USB 2.0 Cables
From Norbert:
Hi Dan,
Just a quick question (I've looked everywhere for a definitive
answer but could not find one): To connect a USB 2 device to a USB 2
computer, do I have to use a USB 2 cable? And if I use a USB 1.1
cable, what happens (compatibility, speed, etc.)?
I would very much appreciate any clarification you can provide.
Thank-you
Norbert
Norbert,
There's no such thing as a "USB 2.0" cable. Cables are
passive devices that work at whatever rate the ports they are connected
to allow, so a "USB 1.1" cable will work at USB 2.0 speeds when
connected to a USB 2.0 port on your Mac and your USB device.
Dan
Unsupported Leopard on a Sawtooth
From Mike Jarve:
Afternoon, Mr. Knight.
I don't know if you're still looking for these sorts of reports, but
if you like, here is my experience.
The system was originally a Sawtooth G4 350, which,
through several upgrades, is now a dual G4 500. Specs are as
follows:
- CPU: 2x XPC7400 @ 450 MHz (overclocked to 500 MHz), Apple OEM CPU
module
- Motherboard: Later revision Sawtooth (UniNorth 7)
- RAM: 4 - 256 MB PC133 (3-3-3), which Apple system profiler
curiously reports as operating at 133 MHz
- Video: "Flashed" GeForce FX 6200/256
- HDD: 2 - 80 GB Western Digital WD800JB
- Optical: Lite-ON 16x DL DVD recordable drive
I had been running 10.4 for some years without issue, but I decided
to take the plunge anyways. I used iCode's Leopard Assist to
prepare the system for installation. Since the system was cluttered up
with a bunch of software I hadn't used in some time, I decided to
perform a clean install, backing up more critical things like my emails
and documents to another drive. I also braced myself for the long boot
due to the GeForce 6200
issue.
The install took about an hour and a quarter with no particular
drama. After the initial boot, I removed the kext that causes the long
boot times and then downloaded and installed all the updates Apple
wanted.
During this, the system seemed inordinately sluggish (kind of like
running OS X 10.1 on a 604 or 603 based Power Mac), but would have
moments where it would seem to speed up. A quick look at the Activity
Monitor revealed that a process called MDWORKER and its accomplice,
MDS, were the cause, collectively taking up all available CPU time. As
it turns out, this was perfectly normal and soon went away (something
to do with cataloging metadata or some such).
Office 2004 installed without a hitch, as did RealPlayer, YIM,
Photoshop CS, Adobe Illustrator, Dreamweaver, and even my
old-enough-to-vote edition of FinalCut Express. The only issues so far
have been an inexplicable issue QuickTime has with some .mov files -
playing them, but showing only a white screen for the video (which, I
might add, started before I upgraded to Leopard - more to the point,
they started with the 7.4 QuickTime update).
As per your requests, I Xbench'd both before and after the upgrade.
Before score using Xbench 1.3 was 30.45; After was 24.56. The most
significant decreases in performance were video related. The UI test in
particular scored only half what it did in Tiger. Otherwise, the scores
for the CPU and drive tests were close enough.
Subjectively, the system feels more sluggish, though it does not
seem to really be a matter of waiting for things. Safari, Mail, and the
Office apps are all snappy enough. It feels slower than it is.
Front Row, VLC, and DVD Player all work just as expected. In fact, I
might note that VLC works even better than it did under Tiger (in my
experience) - it does not crash nearly so easily anymore. As I
mentioned previously, though, the one buggy program appears to be
QuickTime, but that was an issue under Tiger as well.
Overall, I'm pleased. Spaces is one of the best things to happen to
OS X yet, and I suppose that I can also look forward to the usual
increases in speed as updates are released as well. I also have to keep
in mind that I'm running a configuration that Apple not only does not
support, but actively discourages. With that, I can't argue.
Mike Jarve
Mike,
Thanks for sharing your experience with the upgrade to
Leopard. We're always interested in hearing about unsupported
installations.
Dan
Dan Knight has been publishing Low
End Mac since April 1997. Mailbag columns come from email responses to his Mac Musings, Mac Daniel, Online Tech Journal, and other columns on the site.
