Once You Go Mac...
From Ronald Lanham:
Nice
article Dan...
From my own long time experience with computers (decades) and
approximately a decade with Macs...
When PC users say their PCs are 'better' than Macs . . .
what they're really saying is that their PCs are faster at playing
games than Macs.
For a long time this was very true, but as I understand it, now not
even that is always true.
I'm not a gamer (nor are most Mac users that I know), but it would
seem it would make much more sense to just buy a console than to spend
so much on upgrading graphic cards, etc.
Anyone that uses a Mac long enough to feel comfortable (perhaps a
month after installing various third-party helper apps - e.g.
DefaultFolder, DragThing, MaxMenus, etc.) would never think about going
back to using a PC.
I haven't ran a virus app in probably five years and only need
DiskUtility, DiskWarrior, Leopard Cache Cleaner, and MainMenu for
maintenance.
Many people that I talk to that use PCs at work say that when
they get home the last thing they want to do is get on their home PC
unless it's necessary. Gee . . . I wonder why? <g>
G5; OS X 10.5.1; 2 GB RAM; 3 monitors
Regards,
Ronald
Ronald,
Like they say, "Once you go Mac, you never go back."
Not strictly true, as some Linux and Windows users are so caught up in
the paradigms that they've grown used to that it becomes impossible for
them to change operating systems, but a good rule of thumb.
I'm not a gamer, but I know how addictive games can
be. You never hear of someone dying after a 72 hour marathon word
processing session without bathroom breaks, but when an intense new
game comes out, you'll often reach such a story.
I hope I'm not addicted to Macs, but I can tell you
that I feel completely out of my element working with Windows or
Linux.
Dan
Complaint about Gainsaver
From Tony Morris:
I've got a beef. Gainsaver, who is listed on Low End Mac's Best
Power Mac G5 Deal page, is misleading your readers with false pricing
and availability of Mac computers.
My son is currently trying to get a refund from Gainsaver for a G5
1.6 that he ordered and has never received. Gainsaver had and still
have the G5 1.6 listed as available on their website and on Low End
Mac's deal page. My son paid for the order with a cashier's check from
his bank in good faith. Gainsaver can not or will not ship the unit to
my son. In a classic "bait and switch" maneuver, Gainsaver has offered
to sell my son a G5 1.8 for just a few dollars more. But Gainsaver
refuses to refund him his money. Gainsaver insist upon him accepting
their store credit instead.
Would this acceptable to you?
This is atrocious business behavior that should not be tolerated. I
have searched the Web for information about Gainsaver. I found
this very revealing notice from the Better Business Bureau:
Gainsaver has a company rating of D.
Unfortunately for my son, he did not discover the truth about
Gainsaver before he placed his order. You can see the cost of the G5
1.6 on Low End Mac's Deals page, we are not talking about a trivial
amount. He has been trying to get a refund from them for weeks now.
Gainsaver continues to deny his request to return his money. Gainsaver
is still insisting that he accept a store credit. Take a store credit
for a product that they have mislead you and your readership by
advertising Gainsaver had it in stock. This is outrageous offer and
will not be accepted!
What am I asking of you? At the very least you should look closely
at the BBB rating. Low End Mac has always been about information for
the Mac community. Inform your readers of Gainsaver's standing with the
BBB. If you feel that this is deplorable business practice I urge you
to contact Gainsaver yourself. For Gainsaver to falsely advertise price
and availability of product on Low End Mac is disgraceful.
I have been a reader of Low End Mac for many years. You are on my
short list of sites that I go to on a daily basis for information and
insight on the Mac. Please, discover why Gainsaver would operate in
such a fashion. Low End Mac is too good of a website to be tarnished by
this. I thank you for reading this email.
Tony,
Thanks for writing. I'm sorry that a link on Low End
Mac brought you and your son so much trouble. We list dealers because
of good prices and have to assume they provide good service.
I've had good reports about Gainsaver's pricing, which
is what prompted us to list them in our daily price trackers. Gainsaver
has not paid to have its deals listed. (For that matter, none of the
listed dealers have. Some have affiliate programs that reward us when a
sale is made, but Gainsaver is not among them.) We track down and post
these prices as a service to our customers.
Because your son ordered with a cashier's check, he's
covered both by the Postal Service and the FTC. As it says on the BBB
page you provided the link to:
The Federal Trade Commission's Mail Order Rule
protects consumers who shop by mail. According to this regulation, the
company must ship your order when promised. If the company doesn't
specify a shipping time, it must send the merchandise within 30 days.
If there will be a delay, the company must give you the option to
either agree to the delay or cancel the order.
If you decide to cancel your pre-paid order, the
seller must mail your refund within seven business days of receiving
your notice of cancellation.
Based on multiple negative emails received about
Gainsaver (poor business practices, poor quality merchandise, and
misleading pricing), we have removed all links from our site. Thanks
for bringing this to my attention.
Dan
iSub Works with Intel Macs
From Grant Davis:
Hi Dan,
Just
finished reading the latest articles on the site today and noticed a
mention of iSub support in Leopard being broken. That is unfortunate
for many like myself who own or get to use one.
You incorrectly state that iSub support has been unavailable for
some time, I in fact have my iSub working with my Intel-based Mac mini
still running Tiger. This may have changed with some of the newer
versions, and I would be interested to know if that is the case from
others who have more current machines.
Regards,
Grant Davis
Grant,
I don't have an iSub, so I have to rely on what I can
learn from others. Here are some of the articles I read:
- Topic :
iSub problems, Apple Support. First user complains that his
Quad-core Power Mac G5 doesn't work consistently with iSub since
upgrading to Leopard.
- iSub
Problems with Intel-based Macs (and workaround) in OS X Tiger,
Accelerate Your Mac. According to one posting, Apple dropped all iSub
support for Intel Macs in or before March 2007. This person notes that
the iSub will only work with Intel Macs that have other USB audio
hardware (speakers, headset, etc.) attached.
Based on my reading, the iSub will not work reliably
on an Intel-based Mac unless you have another USB audio device
attached, nor is there any iSub support in Leopard.
Dan
My Sonnet Encore Upgrade Hates Tiger
From Dean:
Hey LEM,
I've only recently discovered Low End Mac within the past year, but
I've been a Mac addict since . . . well, since MacAddict was
around really. I had/have the original G3 iMac 333, still owner of a
Beige 300 MHz G3
(upgraded FireWire and USB card kept that thing alive for the longest
time), a G3 Pismo 400
MHz, a G4 Sawtooth
450 MHz, and finally a 12" G4 1.33 GHz. I can't seem to part ways
with these old machines (go figure, Mac junkies out there).
Now I was actually wondering if you can help me with a technical
problem, or if you know of this issue already (and maybe I haven't
found it): I've been gearing up, ready to tackle Leopard with my G4
Sawtooth -
- G4 450 MHz (to be 1.2 GHz, Sonnet Encore)
- 2.0 GB RAM
- OS X Tiger 10.4.11
- 40 GB internal (750 GB external)
- Rage 16 MB (to be 256 MB, GeForce 6200 flashed for Quartz/Core
- I'm prepared to remove the temp. sensor thanks to LEM!)
Anyway: (I also posted this dilemma on
DealNews in search of someone who's already gone through this) my
Sonnet 1.2 GHz g4 upgrade is being difficult and will not boot under
OS X 10.4.11. I've programed my AGP 450 MHz Sawtooth, installed
the firmware for the Sonnet processor 3.1 as well as SonnetCache 1.4
successfully (all OS X), then the installer wants to restart -
okay, so I restart, and the computer monitor just hangs in a deep sleep
(same dilemma as previous posts).
Okay . . . so I shut down and slap the original CPU back in,
rebooted Tiger, then changed startup disc to OS 9.2.2, and proceeded to
install the drivers/firmware for classic 9.2.2 now and it wants to
reboot - voilà, classic 9.2.2 boots as normal!!! Except
there's a dialogue box that says there's a cache memory failure or
something, but then I hit OK, and it continues to load classic 9.2.2!
Then I look at the system profile, and it reads machine speed: 1200 MHz
(so far, so good).
So I thought - okay good - now let's switch start up disc back to
Tiger 10.4.11, then I hit restart - Monitor wakes up, and Tiger boots
up without a problem!! (And there's not cache error this time in Tiger,
like there was in Classic). Double checked, and system profile also
reads 1.2 GHz in Tiger.
Now for the real problem - the Sonnet CPU will refuse to
reboot again once Tiger shuts down!! The monitor will show no signal
again . . . the computer only responds after I plug in the
original CPU, boot up Tiger, change startup disc to Classic, shutdown
Tiger, plug in the Sonnet CPU, boot up Classic (which Sonnet seems to
like), then switch startup disc back to Tiger, and reboot in Tiger.
(It's the same cycle - rinse and repeat :/ ).
My conclusion so far: Sonnet likes Classic, and only boots OS X
Tiger right after Classic - it will not respond if I hadn't loaded
classic prior. Why is it doing this??
FYI: This was the long route that I took to realize that my Sonnet
CPU was the culprit, and that when I unplug the power cord and
reinserting the battery seems to have 'cured' it without dealing with
Classic, but I have to do it every time after shutdown for it to
respond . . . and the 6200 GFX card, oh my god
. . . that's another story in Tiger . . . but I'll
try and troubleshoot the Sonnet first!
Thanks in advance!!!
Dean
Dean,
I haven't worked with any Sonnet upgrades in a long,
long time - like prior to 2001. That said, we used a lot of Sonnet upgrades to give every
Mac IIci the heart of a Quadra,
and they all worked perfectly.
First of all, I hope you've taken this to Sonnet tech
support. The fact that it works in Classic and can work in Tiger after
Classic and a restart (but I'm guessing not a shutdown) could be a
firmware issue, as some settings survive a restart but not a shutdown.
Check with Sonnet if you can try an older version or perhaps a beta if
they're working on a new version.
That's all I can come up with, since your computer
otherwise works flawlessly. Keep us posted!
Dan
Why No Apple Store in Philly?
Dear Dan Knight,
I have been reading and enjoying LEM for a while, and its wealth of
information has proved invaluable to me in turning a G4 Power Mac I purchased from Wegener into a
truly road worthy production box. With the processor upgrade I just
got, an AGP video card I am looking at, and parts I scavenged from a
dear departed Beige G3 and an eMac, my "new" computer will be perfectly
suitable for graphic design and a great fall back machine to my main
box. A thousand thanks!
However, I am kicking around the possibility of biting the bullet
and getting a Mac Pro. My main
computer now is a 1.66 GHz Mac
mini, which has been wonderful until I got the Adobe CS3 suite. I
love CS3, but the apps are memory and processor pigs. I have 2 GB
of RAM in the mini, but I suffer the spinning Beach Ball of Death quite
a bit. I don't want to buy an all-in-one, so my option seems to be to
finance the King's Ransom for a box that will last me a decade.
Which brings me to my real question that maybe you or your readers
may be able to answer: Why are there no Apple stores in the City of
Philadelphia? There are some in the suburbs surrounding Philly, tons of
them in Jersey, and New York has as many as they do Starbuck's, but
Philadelphia has none. There are a couple of dealers who sell Macs in
town, but there's no Apple Store within the city limits. How come? I
was born here and am wondering why "we don't get no respect?"
...and no, I don't want to argue over the merits or demerits of the
City of Brotherly Love. I know Philly's got problems, but I love it
warts and all.
-Joe from Philly
Joe,
I have no clue how a city like Grand Rapids, Michigan
(where I live) merits an Apple Store while Philadelphia doesn't, let
alone why some
cities have several Apple Stores. I'm sure the marketing department
at Apple does a lot of work studying demographics, income levels,
growth patterns, and the like in determining where to put the next
round of Apple Stores, but they don't explain their reasoning.
Be grateful you don't live in Alaska, Idaho, Montana,
Wyoming, North Dakota, South Dakota, Kansas, Arkansas, Louisiana, South
Carolina, West Virginia, Delaware, Vermont, or Maine. None of those
states have any Apple Stores at all at present.
Dan
Unsupported Leopard on an 800 MHz Quicksilver
From Josh Righter:
Hi Dan,
Great site you have here. I'm a recent "convert" to OS X, having
been gifted a G4 Power
Mac in excellent condition. It's an 800 MHz model, so Leopard is
not officially supported, but I decided to give it a go anyway. For the
benefit of others, I present to you my findings:
1. What unsupported Mac(s) have you installed it on? Quicksilver
2002 Power Mac G4 with a few upgrades, including a Pioneer DVD-R
upgraded drive (original SuperDrive did not support DVD writing), a
Sonnet USB 2.0 card, a 120 GB Seagate hard drive, and an AirPort
card.
1. How much RAM? 1.5 GB
2. How fast a CPU, and what brand, if it's an upgrade? Original
800 MHz PowerPC 7455 CPU
3. What video card does your Mac have? Installed with original 32
MB ATI Radeon 7000; upgraded to 128 MB ATI Radeon 9800
after install.
2. Which installation method did you use, a modified installer or
installing from a supported Mac? Installed from supported G5 Power
Mac using FireWire Target Disk Mode. At first, I opted to clone my
existing user account from the G5 Power Mac, but for some reason this
left normally hidden UNIX system folders on the hard drive of the G4
(var, init, etc.), so I redid the process as a fresh installation and
everything went smoothly. Installation time (for the second
installation) was no more than an hour and a half or so.
3. What doesn't work? Especially check out Time Machine (which
requires a second hard drive at least as big as your main one), DVD
Player, Front Row, and VLC. Initially, I could not connect to a
wireless network with the AirPort (note: original, not AirPort Extreme)
card; the card was being listed as being turned off with no way to turn
it on. I found the solution to this online involving simply deleting
and re-adding the AirPort listing in my Network preferences, and it now
works perfectly. DVD Player works well at its default settings, as does
VLC (note: these two were tested using the Radeon 9800, which I
installed shortly after the Leopard install). I unfortunately have not
been able to try Time Machine or Front Row as of this writing.
4. How does performance compare with Tiger subjectively and
objectively? I do not have any experience with Tiger on this
particular G4, so unfortunately I can't answer this. However, I will
say that overall, I'm pretty pleased with the performance of a new OS
running on a system that was made in 2002 (albeit modified somewhat
since then). A few things do seem a bit sluggish (for example, if I run
my mouse along the Dock with magnification turned on, I get a bit of
lag with the magnification animation), but that's probably due to my
low speed, unsupported CPU. I am planning on upgrading the CPU to a 1.5
GHz version in the near future (theoretically placing the system in
"supported" territory), which I hope will clear up any remaining
sluggishness on the system.
What really puts this into perspective for me is the fact that the
PC laptop I migrated from was also made in 2002, and in fact has a bit
of an edge over the G4 in terms of technical specifications. However,
if I were to try and install Windows Vista on the laptop - analogous to
installing 10.5 on the G4 - the result would be a complete disaster.
The fact that Leopard even runs on the G4 (never mind actually running
well enough for me to use the machine for SD video and light Photoshop
and Dreamweaver work) is a testament to the longevity of Apple
machines. When I have the funds, I'll happily take the plunge with a
brand-new powerful Mac, but for now, this old G4 is doing the job
better than any PC from the same time period likely would.
Thanks,
Josh
Josh,
Thanks for sharing your experience. I'm looking
forward to trying Leopard myself someday.
Dan
Dan Knight has been publishing Low
End Mac since April 1997. Mailbag columns come from email responses to his Mac Musings, Mac Daniel, Online Tech Journal, and other columns on the site.
